subscribe.txt× Close

Get the next desktop in your inbox.

A new desktop every week.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Want your desktop here or know someone who should be featured?

Leave your email and we will reach out.

You are looking at one person's real AI setup. A new desktop every week.Subscribe

What is Frances building?

Founder, Small Batch Ventures

The no-yes-man kit

My AI is not allowed to just agree with me. Three pieces do the work. A standing rule bans reflexive lines like "that makes total sense." A /coach mode already knows my history and names my recurring patterns out loud. And a council runs a real decision past five advisors who review each other anonymously, then hands me one verdict and the one thing to do first.

Why
I asked how to stop AI from reflexively validating me in moments of struggle and uncertainty, and then said: honestly, this should be true across every single conversation. Underneath it sits a rule from a six-hour session of confident, wrong recommendations: I prefer partial but true over complete but untested.

How I built it

  1. I wrote down the exact phrases I was sick of and banned them by default.
  2. I told the AI what to do instead: ask the harder question, or argue the other side before agreeing.
  3. I added an opt-out. If I say "just comfort me on this one," it does, for one message.
  4. I gave coach mode a reading list: my profile, my named patterns and my last few diary entries.
  5. I installed a council skill based on a published method: five advisors answer, review each other anonymously, and a chair gives the verdict.
  6. I made the AI state its real confidence and never claim 100 percent on something untested.
To copy it you need
Claude, or the AI of your choice, and a few text files of rules. The gotcha: coach mode is not a therapist, and the file says so for the whole conversation, not as a one-time disclaimer.

Try it yourself

Copy this prompt and paste it into ChatGPT or Claude to try it yourself.

I want to copy the no-yes-man kit from Frances Tang's What Are We Building profile. Her AI is banned from reflexive agreement like "that makes total sense." Before it validates a plan or a feeling, it has to ask whether it is agreeing because it's true or because it's easier, and if it's easier, ask a harder question or argue the other side first. She can say "just comfort me on this one" and it will, for one message only. Her gotcha: this is not permission to be cold. When something really does make sense, the AI says so and says why. Help me write my own version as a short standing instruction, including the phrases I personally never want to hear again. Start by asking which reassuring lines I've stopped believing. Ask me for anything you need.

Tools I used for this project

Next file: Audio tray app

Claude CodeCodexObsidianGitHubSupabaseNetlifyRenderBeehiivRemotionCanvaWispr Flow